Auditors have a duty to correct a false audit report

Posted on February 28th, 2007

This information was posted Monday on Blawgletter:

The Second Circuit today held an auditor potentially liable for federal [tag]securities fraud[/tag] if it doesn’t correct a false or misleading report on its [tag]audit[/tag]. The court said:

The precise issue on appeal is whether an auditor may incur primary liability under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 when the auditor provides a certified opinion that is false or misleading when issued, subsequently learns or was reckless in not learning that the earlier statement was false or misleading, knows or should know that potential investors are relying on the opinion, yet fails to take reasonable steps to correct or withdraw its opinion and/or the underlying financial statements. We hold that under such circumstances, an auditor becomes primarily liable for securities fraud, assuming all the other elements of a securities fraud claim are present. Since the complaint pleads precisely this theory of liability, we vacate the District Court’s dismissal and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Overton v. Todman & Co., CPAs, P.C., No. 06-2496-cv (2d Cir. Feb. 26, 2007).

I think it is safe to say that this decision will definitely have an impact on the future of independent audits.

Related posts:

  1. Should Internal Audit Report to the CFO?
  2. Maybe auditors aren’t as smart as they want you to think they are
  3. Auditors resign from Usana Health Sciences
  4. Barry Minkow Sentenced to Five Years’ Imprisonment on Stock Manipulation Conspiracy
  5. Internal investigations and the use of auditors and accountants

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment

Note that comments which are abusive to the author or other commenters will not be published. Also, comments promoting any multi-level marketing companies, pyramid schemes, or business opportunity scams will not be published. Please do not assume that the author agrees with or endorses any comments left by others.