<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding fraud by looking at ratios</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2007/09/18/finding-fraud-by-looking-at-ratios/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2007/09/18/finding-fraud-by-looking-at-ratios/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:48:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2007/09/18/finding-fraud-by-looking-at-ratios/comment-page-1/#comment-117619</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/2007/09/18/finding-fraud-by-looking-at-ratios/#comment-117619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Usana&#039;s gross sales to active associate ratio was off its 2 year historic trend in Q2 2007. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What it showed was that revenue did not rise enough based on history for the number of active associates usana claimed. It seemed to me that Usana was loading the active associate number. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, if they got a bunch of associates to order in AP3 or the Q, then maybe it would make sense, but again, this was not the case in the prior two years.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Usana&#8217;s gross sales to active associate ratio was off its 2 year historic trend in Q2 2007. </p>
<p>What it showed was that revenue did not rise enough based on history for the number of active associates usana claimed. It seemed to me that Usana was loading the active associate number. </p>
<p>Of course, if they got a bunch of associates to order in AP3 or the Q, then maybe it would make sense, but again, this was not the case in the prior two years.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
