Comments on: Will it ever stop at Overstock.com? http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/ Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:48:29 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Sam E. Antar http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/comment-page-1/#comment-138144 Sam E. Antar Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:23:36 +0000 http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/#comment-138144 To Overstock.com Director Defendants: Have you gotten to the point yet where your last call on Friday afternoon is to your attorneys and then you sit and wait through the weekend until you make your first call on Monday morning to your attorneys? Anxiety setting in? Your sworn declarations show it. Kindest regards, Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO and a convicted felon) To Overstock.com Director Defendants:

Have you gotten to the point yet where your last call on Friday afternoon is to your attorneys and then you sit and wait through the weekend until you make your first call on Monday morning to your attorneys?

Anxiety setting in?

Your sworn declarations show it.

Kindest regards,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO and a convicted felon)

]]> By: Tracy Coenen http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/comment-page-1/#comment-138067 Tracy Coenen Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:22:42 +0000 http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/#comment-138067 The 8-K says he resigned on December 31, effective immediately. The declaration says he was president until January 2. Those statements cannot both be true. Please look at the highlighted portions above. The 8-K says he resigned on December 31, effective immediately. The declaration says he was president until January 2. Those statements cannot both be true. Please look at the highlighted portions above.

]]> By: john lichtenstein http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/comment-page-1/#comment-138056 john lichtenstein Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:19:15 +0000 http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/#comment-138056 How is the declaration proof? His resignation was announced January 2nd. In the declaration, he said he was president till the 2nd. What's the problem? He didn't say that he was president until he "resigned effective the 2nd". Sure this might call for clarification but it's not hard to believe it can be explained. How is the declaration proof? His resignation was announced January 2nd. In the declaration, he said he was president till the 2nd. What’s the problem? He didn’t say that he was president until he “resigned effective the 2nd”. Sure this might call for clarification but it’s not hard to believe it can be explained.

]]> By: Tracy Coenen http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/comment-page-1/#comment-138046 Tracy Coenen Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:35:50 +0000 http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/#comment-138046 The declaration is the proof that the resignation was backdated. You're right that the WF document doesn't prove one way or another what date he resigned, just that it was either the 31st or the 2nd, neither of which are reflected in the WF document. The declaration is the proof that the resignation was backdated. You’re right that the WF document doesn’t prove one way or another what date he resigned, just that it was either the 31st or the 2nd, neither of which are reflected in the WF document.

]]> By: john lichtenstein http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/comment-page-1/#comment-138036 john lichtenstein Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:21:29 +0000 http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/2008/01/17/will-it-ever-stop-at-overstockcom/#comment-138036 I don't get it. The resignation was announced the second so in the Gradient declaration, he used the date of the announcement. No backdating. For the Wells Fargo deal, that's a little more strange. The agreement would not have been all worked out and written up on the 1st. It was already worked out with Lindsey's name on it. Maybe they should have removed Lindsey's name from the list on the 1st. And the agreement changed again not long after so there might have been a little surprise as WF. But this isn't proof of backdating. I don’t get it. The resignation was announced the second so in the Gradient declaration, he used the date of the announcement. No backdating.

For the Wells Fargo deal, that’s a little more strange. The agreement would not have been all worked out and written up on the 1st. It was already worked out with Lindsey’s name on it. Maybe they should have removed Lindsey’s name from the list on the 1st. And the agreement changed again not long after so there might have been a little surprise as WF. But this isn’t proof of backdating.

]]>