Four Key Pieces to an Effective Corporate Fraud Investigation

There are four critical pieces to a corporate investigative puzzle. With the proliferation of stories of corporate fraud, managers and executives would be wise to familiarize themselves with the workings of a corporate fraud investigation.

A corporate investigative policy is necessary because it is important to have guidelines in place for the start of an investigation. What should management do when fraud is suspected? How are fraud allegations to be evaluated? When and why does the company initiate a full-blown investigation?

Most managers and executive haven’t had to deal with allegations of serious fraud. They need some guidance so that evidence isn’t corrupted and so that the allegations are handled fairly. A well-designed policy will help avoid claims of selective treatment. It also brings uniformity to the process so that similar offenses are treated similarly.

The investigative team will carry out the full fraud investigation. Depending on the seriousness of the allegations and the level of examination required, the team could be as few as one or two people, or as many as dozens of people. The team might include: attorney, fraud examiner or forensic accountant, auditor, private investigator, computer consultant, and a management representative.

A properly managed fraud investigation is critical to the successful resolution of a corporate fraud. Included in the responsibility for management of the investigation are: document management procedures and supervision of staff and consultants.  The key is being able to quickly locate critical documents, and ensuring that all necessary issues are examined.

Every fraud investigation is unique, since each fraud has its own set of facts and details. The purpose of the investigation should be to determine whether or not a fraud occurred, who was responsible for it, and how much was lost to the fraud. Evidence of the findings must be gathered and presented to those who need to know, such as the lead attorney, upper management, and the board of directors.

2 thoughts on “Four Key Pieces to an Effective Corporate Fraud Investigation”

  1. Should any or all of the individuals on the team investigating the alleged fraud be employees of the company? Does it benefit the company more if the members of this team have no ties?

    “When you can’t be there, bVisual.”

  2. My preference is that the investigators have no ties w/ the people or departments affected. So for small companies, they’d have to bring in someone from the outside. Large companies have their own investigators, but they’re so far removed from operations that there’s usually not a conflict.

    When in doubt, go for the option that has investigators with the greatest amount of independence.

Leave a Reply