An opinion on limiting auditor liability

Jack Cieslieski at Accounting Observer wrote a piece auditor liability. Auditing firms have been seeks caps on their liability for failed audits. Large firms are afraid that they might end up in the same trouble Arthur Andersen found themselves in post-Enron: Huge liability put them out of business.

But Jack makes a very interesting observation: Auditors could limit their own liability by choosing to do better audits. There’s nothing stopping them from being more thorough in their audits and creating better procedures that make the audits more effective. I agree!


Related Posts

  1. Auditor liability in market meltdown?
  2. PCAOB reports on BDO Seidman and Grant Thornton
  3. Audit firms suggesting companies be required to have forensic audits
  4. The cost (and risks) of becoming an audit partner
  5. Is the IRS picking on small businesses?

Leave a Comment

Comments containing profanity, personal attacks, threats, abuse, hate speech, or otherwise objectional content will not be published. Do not assume that the author of this blog agrees with or endorses any comments made by commenters. Promotion of MLM companies is not permitted, and that includes linking to MLM sites and making unsubstantiated earnings claims.