Comments on: The Sarah Palin pregnancy cover-up that wasn’t (updated)

By: Tammy S

Tammy S — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:58:28 +0000

HA! It’s downright hilarious to read all the moronic comments from people who bought into the conspiracy theory that Trig was actually Bristol’s child. Where’s your comments now, people?

By: Tracy Coenen

Tracy Coenen — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:18:05 +0000

Hmmm. Baby born to Bristol Palin on December 28. Imagine that. A real live pregnancy with a real live baby.

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20245389,00.html

By: Sandy

Sandy — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 06:59:06 +0000

***Moderator note****

Sandy/George – We don’t allow sock puppeting here, so please don’t try to promote your smears with other screen names. Your comments have been deleted, and will continue to be deleted so long as you continue on a smear campaign.

By: Craig Hansen

Craig Hansen — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:57:30 +0000

Forget Palin. The late, great George Carlin is being smeared here as much as she is. They are both about equally capable of answering for themselves, but at least George Carlin has the excuse of being dead.

By: Tracy Coenen

Tracy Coenen — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:17:31 +0000

George – The sick smears you tried to post have been deleted.

By: Craig Hansen

Craig Hansen — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:03:05 +0000

George – I’m no fan of Sarah Palin, and I would have gladly voted against her if it wasn’t for the 49th parallel, but you’re an idiot by comparison.

By: Tracy Coenen

Tracy Coenen — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:59:30 +0000

George – Not that you’d want to let the facts get in the way of your disgusting smears on the Palin family…. But you might like to know that a normal pregnancy is expected to be 40 weeks long. However, a birth anywhere between 37 weeks and 42 weeks is still considered normal.

By: George Carlin

George Carlin — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:57:54 +0000

Trig Palin was born April 18, 2008.
The whole point of the ‘national announcement’ that Bristol Palin was “about 5 months pregnant” on September 1, 2008 was to ‘prove’ that she couldn’t be Trig’s mother.

So, here we are, December 22. No baby from Bristol yet.

April 18 + 9 months = Jan 18, 2009
Tick, tick. The alibi is slipping away…
Grampa says the ‘due date’ was Dec 20th.
I hope Bristol is not having any problems with her pregnancy…
Maybe the whole mother-in-law arrest for hillbilly heroin made her upset… not good when you’re expecting.

By: Craig Hansen

Craig Hansen — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:35:57 +0000

Agreed. Whether she won or lost, Bristol and her baby should never have commanded as much attention as they did. Her version of Kevin Federline was a humorous sideshow, but even he didn’t deserve the spotlight that he received. Yo.

As I’ve said before, the only truly noteworthy aspect of the whole Bristol pregnancy is it serves as an anecdote about the effectiveness of abstinence-only sex education, and only because Sarah Palin is a proponent of that strategy.

By: Tracy Coenen

Tracy Coenen — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:04:01 +0000

I think the short answer to your question is: “None of your business. Leave her alone.”