<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only at Overstock.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/10/28/only-at-overstockcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/10/28/only-at-overstockcom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More accounting mistreatment by Overstock.com (NASDAQ:OSTK) and CEO Patrick Byrne&#160;&#124;&#160;Sequence Inc. Fraud Files Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/10/28/only-at-overstockcom/comment-page-1/#comment-183007</link>
		<dc:creator>More accounting mistreatment by Overstock.com (NASDAQ:OSTK) and CEO Patrick Byrne&#160;&#124;&#160;Sequence Inc. Fraud Files Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/?p=2738#comment-183007</guid>
		<description>[...] of incompetence involved as well. Overstock is the only public company I&#8217;ve seen which has to restate restated financial statements. The list of accounting manipulations continues to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of incompetence involved as well. Overstock is the only public company I&#8217;ve seen which has to restate restated financial statements. The list of accounting manipulations continues to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Coenen</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/10/28/only-at-overstockcom/comment-page-1/#comment-166607</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Coenen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/?p=2738#comment-166607</guid>
		<description>Ohhh.... So the explanation isn&#039;t the the &quot;hooking up&quot; of the accounting system, it&#039;s general incompetence? Because I never would have guessed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh&#8230;. So the explanation isn&#8217;t the the &#8220;hooking up&#8221; of the accounting system, it&#8217;s general incompetence? Because I never would have guessed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO and a convicted felon)</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/10/28/only-at-overstockcom/comment-page-1/#comment-166596</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO and a convicted felon)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/?p=2738#comment-166596</guid>
		<description>Overstock.com is restating its financial statements prior to 2005 to reflect its revenue accounting error uncovered by the SEC, earlier this year. Originally, the company used a one-time cumulative adjustment in Q4 2007, rather than a restatement to correct its revenue accounting errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overstock.com is restating its financial statements prior to 2005 to reflect its revenue accounting error uncovered by the SEC, earlier this year. Originally, the company used a one-time cumulative adjustment in Q4 2007, rather than a restatement to correct its revenue accounting errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john lichtenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2008/10/28/only-at-overstockcom/comment-page-1/#comment-166592</link>
		<dc:creator>john lichtenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sequence-inc.com/fraudfiles/?p=2738#comment-166592</guid>
		<description>Simple. Before the botched Oracle implementation, the in-house developed &quot;spread sheet&quot; based systems also were not recording returns correctly.  But the Oracle implementation made the problem worse. And they never would have figured out the problem with the pre-Oracle systems except that they, apparently recently, did regression testing with the Oracle and legacy process and found problems with both. 

That should have been done before Oracle went on-line, but they had bigger problems at the time so they cut some corners. Testing schmesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple. Before the botched Oracle implementation, the in-house developed &#8220;spread sheet&#8221; based systems also were not recording returns correctly.  But the Oracle implementation made the problem worse. And they never would have figured out the problem with the pre-Oracle systems except that they, apparently recently, did regression testing with the Oracle and legacy process and found problems with both. </p>
<p>That should have been done before Oracle went on-line, but they had bigger problems at the time so they cut some corners. Testing schmesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
