We now have a Socialist marketplace. I thought that the Democrats were the ones who would lead us there, but I was wrong. It is a Republican administration that has taken us down this road to ruin.

No longer does capitalism mean what it used to… that people worked hard to succeed, and determined their own success or failure. We had some government programs in place to help those in need when they were down on our luck.

But now government intervention, financed by the taxpayers, is the norm.

This massive bailout doesn’t just affect Wall Street. It affects everyone, primarily because we as taxpayers will finance the $500 billion to $1 trillion this bailout is estimated to cost.

Big banks that made bad loans in the process of trying to create ever bigger profits…. Turn those loser bad loans over to Uncle Sam and he’ll (we’ll) eat the losses. Those profitable loans.. You just keep those for yourself.

Taxpayers now finance all the risk in the financial sector. Don’t worry about those executives who made tens of millions of dollars from risky transactions. Don’t worry about the fact that the imminent collapse of companies was because of horrible decisions by their leaders and deceit of business partners and investors. Taxpayers will pay for it.

We as taxpayers have zero upside to this new breed of Socialism. We can’t share in the upside from the financial sector. Only the downside. As Michelle Malkin said yesterday:

Bush Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson just wrapped up his press conference announcing the Mother of All Bailouts. He said a “bold” approach was needed to achieve “stability” in the market.

Let me translate that.

“Bold” = Massively massive, taxpayer-funded rescue.

“Stability” = Privatizing profits and socializing losses on a scale we have never seen before in our lifetimes.

And where do we draw the line for bailing out private businesses? Our government decided that the financials “couldn’t” fail. What industry is next? The U.S. automakers are standing there with their hands out.

When does it stop? When do we stop making the little guy (average taxpayer) pay for the risk of the huge, irresponsible companies and their executives, who have made billions of dollars (now at our expense)?

10 Comments

  1. Michael Goode 09/20/2008 at 9:05 pm - Reply

    It stops when those who support the free market stop reflexively vote Republican. It stops when we stop believing the lies our politicians tell us and vote for someone who actually does believe in the free markets (hint: it sure as hell is not John McCain). It stops when we realize that successful tax evasion, while perhaps imprudent, is the simplest and most moral way an individual can fight the government.

    Or, as the pessimist in me would argue, it will stop only after it has gotten much, much worse and those who believe in freedom are forced to take up arms against the government. That is the same way it always stops.

  2. Tracy Coenen 09/20/2008 at 10:46 pm - Reply

    I don’t feel that John McCain is the answer to this, but Barack Obama surely would be even more disastrous. I will do whatever I can to make sure Obama does not become president. If he does, there is absolutely no hope whatsoever.

  3. quixtarisacult 09/20/2008 at 11:26 pm - Reply

    Tracy…

    I have a question. I’ve heard something that is very alarming. If the tax payers are going to have to bear the burden of these bail outs, where is the money actually coming from now? The news I’ve heard is that the government will simply print it. Is this really the case? Might this be a very, very dangerous situation for everyone. Might our currency be devalued in a way never seen in modern times?

    I also see a trend that reminds me of the old runs on banks, but this time it isn’t so much a run on banks, but a run on people rushing to get their money out of the stock market regardless of all the care the media has taken to keep investors from panicking. Isn’t this why the bail out is actually going forward, because to not do it would possibly prompt a collapse of the markets never seen since the, yes, Great Depression? All the incredible expenditures to fund the war in Iraq, Afghanistan and homeland security outlays within our own borders (for the likes of chemical suits and what not that will remain mothballed until they are obsolete) has made the US vulnerable to the very thing that the terrorists hoped to accomplish when they attacked the heart of the financial district? Could the incredible knee jerk reaction of our government after 911 do for the terrorists what the actual attack failed to pull off?

    I truly doubt that these problems have gone unnoticed by the people in the know. Seems like there have been a lot of people trying to sit on this bad news, possibly hoping to get the nation past the November elections before the ramifications were openly revealed as they have this past week. I liken it to parents trying to get their children to a service station rest room to avoid the embarrassing situation of having to stop and let junior out by the side of the busy highway to relieve himself. Anyway, our financial wizards couldn’t hold it anymore and they have had to relieve themselves tragically by the side of the road without making it to the closest road side rest or service station.

    You can’t tell me that no one knew these financial institutions were not jumping a jig for some time trying to cross their legs until their eyes finally crossed and their eyes bugged out calling a stop to the car, demanding to have relief by the aforementioned side of the highway. Such an incredibly embarrassing situation, not just for the Republicans but the Democrats as well. Both McCain and Obama already accepting large contributions from the likes of AIG. I have to question these contributions from a company that had to know they were deep into a world of major hurt, trying to hold back the panic. Partisanship aside, we are all in this together, and it isn’t good. Jaded I am, and from your tone Tracy, so are you.

    The CEOs–who have taken their multi-million dollar salaries—and are going to now get a bail out from the very people who made their salaries possible in the first place. You think a little old fashioned head rolling might be in order? I am not saying that we pull out the guillotine, but maybe McCain isn’t wrong for calling for someone’s job, but why make the FEC chair the scape goat? I have many times railed about the FTC who has sat back and allowed certain billionaires have their way with their product pyramid schemes which have only served to make suckers out of the soap touting neighbors next door. The FTC turned their head to the stink and let the scammers continue their money extraction. Now the FEC is taking the heat for lack of oversight; well, should we have a double standard with the alphabet soup regulators that suck up tax payer dollars but do nothing to protect the common man while allowing the self interests of special interest billionaires be served?

    I always wondered why the crowds cheered when they took the head off of the French gal who said “let them eat cake!” Our government has been the puppets of special interests for too long now. The little man has been told to eat cake in so many ways I can’t even begin to tell you in this relatively short comment. The tax payers are going to be eating cake for some time now, if they are lucky enough to even be able to afford it. A pox on both the houses of the Democrats and the Republicans and especially the special interest groups that while going into the proverbial grave were still dishing out cash to politicians.

    Back to my question? If the government isn’t going to print all the bail out money, are they going to borrow it from foreign interests then? If so, wouldn’t this be a further selling out of America? It is unfortunate that this has happened with so few days left until the election. Isn’t it hypocritical for the candidates to now shift the blame onto “the alphabet soup” of regulators who have sat on their hands looking the other way while all this situation was escalating. This isn’t a situation that is going to be resolved by an election, because both parties are guilty and need to answer for their inability to stop the graft and influence peddling that has been the norm.

  4. Tracy Coenen 09/20/2008 at 11:29 pm - Reply

    I think this bailout is just prolonging the inevitable. Our system is broken, and this doesn’t fix it. It just delays the pain. There needs to be a change, and this is not it. If anything, I think it sets us up for even MORE failure. (Imagine being a big bank getting bailed out from bad business practices. Why change those practices? Making bad loans pays off. The government will come to the rescue. Might as well engage in more risky business, because there is no downside.)

    As for printing money… that’s just a recirculated urban legend. I do believe the money will have to be borrowed internationally. (No, that’s not much better than printing money.)

  5. Lee D 09/21/2008 at 8:38 am - Reply

    It’s precisely because banks knew their risk was mitigated by the potential of a government bailout that they took outsized risks in search of higher profits. Privatizing profit and socializing risks is in no way a free market.

    Mr. Q, because US debt is denominated in it’s own currency, technically it can never default on it’s debt, because it can keep printing more money. However, that’s an inflationary scenario and just as bad as a default, only a different flavor of bad.

    While everybody has been talking about the collateralized mortgage instruments that have seen collossal defaults, not many people have thought about other debt instruments based on the American consumer. Credit cards and car finance are all collateralized as well. What’s going to happen to the banks’ balance sheets, already ravaged by bad mortgate paper when people REALLY start missing car payments?

  6. Barbara 09/21/2008 at 8:45 am - Reply

    What needs to happen first and formost is the head honchos of all these companies need to fork over all the money they made on their inability to secure a loan to someone who could actually afford the loan they were getting. Along with all the bad loans they handed out to people unaware of what they were getting into. Sure this will not make a real big dent in the disaster we are about to see but it will teach these Money Hungry Fools that they can not get away with what they did.

    Someone somewhere knew this would happen way back when and they did not send up the white flag back then to surrender the news to the people being suckered into the mess. I would like to see the people at fault take credit for the mess they created and they be the ones to do something about it. Not the hard working tax payers of America who had nothing to do with any of it to begin with. It is bad enough most of us will never see the money we put into Social Security but to bail out companies whoes negligance is not at the fault of the general public is the wrong thing to do. I do not think we need to have our taxes raised just to pay off this debt. Why dont the presidential canidates take some of that lovely donation maney they got from some of those companies and pay off some of that debt… Heck with the money raised from the elections that could have made a nice payment that the Taxpayers would not have to endure in the future. Seriously does any of that crap we get sent in the mail telling us about a canidate really make a differance in the way we vote… of course not…people believe what they want to believe. If they want to be really informed they need to research what the canidates have done not listen to someone promote the person by telling them what they want to hear and never the truth…

  7. quixtarisacult 09/21/2008 at 11:21 am - Reply

    Lee…

    Your explanation of how the government can basically borrow the money from people named John Q Public by yes, printing more money, sounds exactly like what this bail out is. I just do not think John Q is going to fully understand the finer details as you expressed them. The government is going to force us to borrow from our self, and Tracy is correct that the situation has gotten so bad that the GW Bush Administration has gone “socialist” in maybe the worst case scenario any President has ever got us, John Q into.

    It seems like John Q Bush now has been painted into a corner, having little option but to fall on the socialism sword, something the long trunks have accused the jack asses of wanting to do. Regardless, both of these parties are forced to ride in the same car and take us all down the road socialism road which Tracy so correctly described!

    If I can remember correctly, the other instruments you are talking about (consumer finance, credit card and car loans) have been touted and badly oversold as well. For awhile I considered all the junk mail trying to get me to sign up for another credit card to be a potential alternative means to heat my home through the long winter. I could just install a credit card junk mail burner where my current natural gas unit sets now. Also, every time I turned my radio on my ears were bombarded with stupid crazy commercials urging me to drag my wreck of a perfectly good auto down the the car lot and trade it in for a new payment book. You are indeed correct that we can’t view the mortgage industry as being the only sector of greed. All of these “instruments” get bought up by what (I hate to say it) is a “pyramid scheme” of greed that the buyers and speculators of these “instruments” have caused. Now that these “agregators” (rhymes with alligators) of bad debt have had a disruption of their food chain, they are passing their greed inspired losing bet up onto us, John Q, who is the only carrion left for these vultures to dine on! We actually have been the carrion all along and still are. The only thing standing between us, John Q Carrion, and these greedy bankers, now turned turkey buzzard, is our entire government–not the very unfortunate Bush White House, but the other “houses” in Washington as well in this town who have taken special interest money. As a result, the toothless “alphabet soup”supposedly “pit bull” regulators that have been retrained by legislators that have appointed members of the very sectors to oversee the very industry they represent effectively making these regulators not “pit bulls” but mere toy poodle lap dogs for all the Fanny’s, AIGs, and even the group of Amway lead DSA hiding “true” pyramid operators as well.

    It was okay when it is the common folk packing up to leave their homes, or the soap touting “stupido” neighbor being shorn like sheep; but when all of a sudden it is the front corporations for the cigar chomping crowd (to include the Devos/Van Andel empire Pooh Bahs of funneling special interest money to protect their world wide American Scam) as well as many other scoundrels, are the ones in trouble. You can be sure these big money players are stuffing their cash in some mattress somewhere. Being on the receiving end of special interests our leaders have let deregulation work in the favor of greed, not in the public interest and protected their own self interest of keeping special interest money coming their way.

    I have asked all the candidates during the primary season to speak out and to state their positions on this other huge segment of corruption which is MLM and especially on AMWAY, but not a single party has taken a stand because they took Amway money instead!

    Tracy, I know we have sort of bumped heads over little things like which party and candidate should be supported in this election. Notice that I am not making an endorsement for either one at the present moment. Both parties have failed on the issues that you and I have exposed as corrupt while just merely being legal. A do nothing FTC has sat on their hands and allowed the likes of Amway, Usana, Herbalife, and other relatively faceless Direct Selling Association company members to run their mafia like money extracting schemes and scams on the American public with the distributors being the “Stockholm Syndrome-like” victims stupidly supporting their own victimization. It is a time to bring pyramid schemes to an end, whether they be in the public or private sector; whether they are under the FTC or FEC regulative agencies, both of which have sat on the laps licking the faces of the very same cigar chomping people they are supposed to oversee.

    The American people have been made the “marks” in this entire bad situation and now the politicians believe we John Q Public have to now be “taken to school” and educated how we are going to bail out the vultures. Instead of us being taken to school, shouldn’t someone be “TAKEN TO THE WOODSHED INSTEAD!”

    Sadly, neither of the candidates for president at the moment can truly claim any high ground about the situation. Both having received contributions from the very companies that the public is being forced to bail out. In the worst flip flopping I’ve ever seen, how can anyone brag one minute about being a powerful Washington insider one day and the next day turn on their colleagues and paint them as being the problem. It really just doesn’t work for either John or Barack. Indeed, one candidate has a plan to muck out the stable he had claimed to be a mover and shaker in, while the other candidate basically votes “present” and proposes no plan. STOP THE MADNESS!

    It’s a bad situation for the average-Joe citizens who in the end are left to extinguish a flaming bag of feces that our glorious leaders set on our door step, knocking on our foreclosed door and then scamper down the street like teenagers knowing it is our shoe that will stink for many years to come. But fear not citizens because there is still hope; Bruce McCall of the Huffington post claims John McCall said in a tongue in cheek comical parody that “Every American should buy an Amway distributorship, sit back and watch the cash pour in…”

    Seems like the money from Amway has indeed poured in to the pockets of our legislators, two of which are current members of this esteemed body. What has this country come to when Amway has become the answer to all our economic woes? Two pyramid schemes of greed stroking their lap dogs the FEC and the FTC. How existential!

  8. quixtarisacult 09/21/2008 at 12:23 pm - Reply

    Barbara…

    In old school Soviet Russia, they would have frozen the accounts of these financial wizards, putting their filthy lucre back into the coffers of the party; put these greedy scumbags against the Kremlin wall for target practice, and continued to act as if everything was glorious! Socialism marches on.

    Oh, I might add, don’t worry, your cut of retirement money is completely safe in the pyramid scheme that our social security system has always been. hehehe!

  9. Tracy Coenen 09/21/2008 at 3:22 pm - Reply

    Ugggh…. Social Security didn’t have to be a pyramid scheme. It could have been a strict “pay as you go” system if it had been continuously updated as the times changed. Retirement age was designated as 65 in 1935 when Social Security came into existence. Pension plans at the time designated retirement age between 65 and 70, so this was consistent. (See here: http://www.ssa.gov/history/age65.html)

    Note this: “The studies showed that using age 65 produced a manageable system that could easily be made self-sustaining with only modest levels of payroll taxation.”

    Life expectancy plays into this as well. In 1940, a 65 yr old man could be expected to live 12.7 years.

    By 1990, a 65 yr old man was expected to live 15.3 years. That’s only 2.6 years more, but represents a 20% increase in life expectancy. (See here: http://www.ssa.gov/history/lifeexpect.html)

    By 2005, a 65 yr old man was expected to live 17.2 years. That’s 4.5 years beyond the initial figures, or a 35% increase in life expectancy. (See here: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus07.pdf#027)

    That’s a significant difference on a percentage basis, and one for which our system really hasn’t been updated. Retirement age HAS been increased a bit, but not enough to cover that.

    AND… No one was thinking about baby boomers. The sheer number of people now retired and scheduled to retire in the next 5 to 10 years is massive. And the system wasn’t set up to deal with the huge number of retirees compared to the low number of workers. In 1940, there were 9 million Americans age 65 or older. In 2000, there were 34.9 million.

    In 2003, there were 35.9 million people in the U.S. at age 65 or older, representing 12% of our total population. (See page 15 of this pdf: http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p23-209.pdf)

    The Social Security system has become a Ponzi scheme because it hasn’t changed with the times. And who is stupid enough to change it? Older people cast lots of votes, and doing anything that is perceived to harm them can be political suicide.

  10. quixtarisacult 09/21/2008 at 4:50 pm - Reply

    Tracy

    It would have been better if the social security system had remained a pyramid shape. Instead it has become more of a square with as many on the bottom as there are on the top; well not exactly, but it is headed in that general direct. I was just wondering if you had ever seen the move Soylent Green? A potential answer to our SS (lightning bolts intended) system woes as well, another issue you do not hear too much about in this election year. Seems like politicians don’t like to talk about issues in which failures happen to be the norm, unless you are in the opposing party. Socialism, let the good times roll. I suppose this bail out means that health care is out for another 4 years?

    Social security is a sacred cow that just by its very mention will bring down the gray army on your blog to see if someone is threatening its very existence. I am not against it. Just in the past war years our government has probably squandered enough money to have propped up Social Security far into the future if they so desired. In light of the way Iran is saber rattling all the time, maybe it might have been better to have Sadam around to take a fight to them every so many years as they have been want to do over the short history of man. Just being a murderous despot how kills his own people has not qualified other similarly situated depots for invasion in the past. Look at Idi Amin Dada who for many years murdered and tortured the inhabitants of his oil poor Uganda. The US sat by for years and allowed that river of blood to flow in a type of discrimination against the victims, as if these poor black Africans just weren’t somehow worth taking to task. Might I mention Pol Pot as well whose victims did not inspire much pity either. Eventually the despots country man rose up and overthrew the murderers which probably would have happened eventually to Sadam. Waging an unnecessary war in Iraq has further expanded the national debt and in retrospect the money could have been used to address many problems at home rather than waging a war against people who did not attack the World Trade Center. They happened to sit in a strategic spot and reside over oil reserves which we really are not taking full advantage of. To the victor goes the spoils doesn’t apply anymore. The Roman Empire did not operate this way. Their eagle took advantage of all conquered nations.

    Might the Gray Brigade retired defenders of their social security system make an issue out of the insane out of control fiscal irresponsibility of our government has engaged in for decades? Will they be the next group of citizens who have to work longer into their twilight years? One good thing about the current financial melt down, it takes the focus off of the massive expenditures and deficit spending you do not hear the political parties talk about very often, not like they did back when Ronald Reagan ruled the roost. I think we could use a Ronald Reagan now, but sadly I don’t see anyone on the horizon who carried the kind of weight he did with both right and left.

Leave a Reply