{"id":1210,"date":"2008-01-14T20:49:20","date_gmt":"2008-01-15T02:49:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sequence-inc.com\/fraudfiles\/2008\/01\/14\/more-on-the-auditor-change-at-catapult\/"},"modified":"2008-01-15T17:31:24","modified_gmt":"2008-01-15T23:31:24","slug":"more-on-the-auditor-change-at-catapult","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/more-on-the-auditor-change-at-catapult\/","title":{"rendered":"More on the auditor change at Catapult"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last week I wrote about Catapult Communications (NASDAQ: CATT) switching from Deloitte &amp; Touche to a much smaller local firm, in a post called \t\t\t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sequence-inc.com\/fraudfiles\/2008\/01\/08\/big-four-big-fees\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Big Four = Big Fees<\/a>. In that post I referenced <a href=\"http:\/\/cfo.com\/article.cfm\/10491182\/c_10489810?f=home_todayinfinance\">the CFO.com article<\/a> from which I got my information. The article focused on the difference in fees between the firms: $985,000 for Deloitte and $561,000 for the small firm. That big savings was portrayed as <strong>the reason<\/strong> Catapult switched.<\/p>\n<p>And in rides Francine McKenna of <a href=\"http:\/\/retheauditors.blogspot.com\/2008\/01\/catapult-and-deloitte-look-past-end-of.html\">re: The Auditors<\/a>.  She raises a good point. Why did Catapult go to great pains to detail the reason for the switch from Deloitte to a virtual no-name firm? Was Catapult trying to embarrass Deloitte?<\/p>\n<p>Well I think Francine may have found the answer, one which she suggests CFO.com might have found if they hadn&#8217;t just accepted Catapult&#8217;s story at face value. You see,  in the company&#8217;s annual report for  the year ended September 30, 2007, it was noted that a<strong> material weakness<\/strong> from the prior year was remediated.<\/p>\n<p>What was this weakness, you ask? Well, you can see what the weakness was if you read the fix that was noted <a href=\"http:\/\/edgar.sec.gov\/Archives\/edgar\/data\/1063085\/000095013407025363\/f34207e10vk.htm#115\">in that annual report<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     The Company\u2019s Chief Financial Officer performs a detailed     quarterly review to confirm that the Company\u2019s accounting     for its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments is in     accordance with the requirements of generally accepted     accounting principles in the United States.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Uh&#8230;. if the &#8220;fix&#8221; is that the CFO now reviews cash and short-term investments to see if they&#8217;re reported in accordance with GAAP, then the weakness was that <strong>he wasn&#8217;t doing it before! <\/strong>And&#8230;. not doing it was deemed a material weakness by Deloitte.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s pretty bad. And who knows.. maybe Catapult is upset that Deloitte forced them to fix the problem and make the disclosure.<\/p>\n<p>Francine also notes that Catapult switched auditors in January of 2006, too, dumping PriceWaterhouseCoopers and hiring Deloitte.<\/p>\n<p>Francine and I agree on this: It is not uncommon for companies to go opinion shopping.<\/p>\n<p>Could that be what we&#8217;re witnessing here?<\/p>\n<p><strong>UPDATE:<\/strong> More on Dennis Howlett&#8217;s take <a href=\"http:\/\/www.accmanpro.com\/2008\/01\/15\/more-on-catapult-systems-and-deloitte\/\">is found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week I wrote about Catapult Communications (NASDAQ: CATT) switching from Deloitte &amp; Touche to a much smaller local firm, in a post called Big Four = Big Fees. In that post I referenced the CFO.com article from which I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-auditing-regulations"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6Z0e-jw","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1210\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sequenceinc.com\/fraudfiles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}